Spots of Substance: 22nd July 2012

  How was your week? I learnt a whole bunch of new things about motorsport journalism, fell flat on my rear at the first time ice skating for nearly a decade…and began Ramadaan.  I also spent a lot of time online and here are some particularly interesting things I came across!

(after you check out the links, of course :P)

Striking truths. A new picture with an inspirational saying (like the above) every day…

So what is Ramadaan exactly? Glad you asked: Ramadaan guide for non-Muslims

Why smart people are dumb via The New Yorker

Perhaps our most dangerous bias is that we naturally assume that everyone else is more susceptible to thinking errors, a tendency known as the “bias blind spot.” This “meta-bias” is rooted in our ability to spot systematic mistakes in the decisions of others—we excel at noticing the flaws of friends—and inability to spot those same mistakes in ourselves.

How much money do you need to be happy? What is your number? An interesting post on money, happiness, indulgence and sharing…

But what about individuals who are notorious for their struggles with sharing? Surely the emotional benefits of giving couldn’t possibly apply to very young children, who cling to their possessions as though their lives depended on it. To find out, we teamed up with the developmental psychologist Kiley Hamlin and gave toddlers the baby-equivalent of gold: goldfish crackers. Judging from their beaming faces, they were pretty happy about this windfall. But something made them even happier. They were happiest of allwhen giving some of their treats away to their new friend, a puppet named Monkey. Monkey puppets aside, the lesson is clear: maximizing our happiness is not about maximizing our goldfish. To be clear, having more goldfish (or more gold) doesn’t decrease our happiness — those first few crackers may provide a genuine burst of delight. But rather than focusing on how much we’ve got in our bowl, we should think more carefully about what we do with what we’ve got — which might mean indulging less, and may even mean giving others the opportunity to indulge instead.

Omar Offendum – A Syrian American rapper, using his gift to try bring voice to the uprisings in Syria, muses at The Rolling Stone.

Owen Jones: On Islamophobia in Europe

In France – where recently 42 per cent polled for Le Monde believed that the presence of Muslims was a "threat" to their national identity – a record number voted for the anti-Muslim National Front in April's presidential elections. Denmark's third largest party is the People's Party, which rails against "Islamisation" and demands the end of all non-Western immigration. The anti-Muslim Vlaams Belang flourishes in Flemish Belgium. But those who take a stand against Islamophobia are often demanded to qualify it with a condemnation of extremism. When is this ever asked of other stands against prejudice?

How do you deal with feelings of intellectual inadequacy? “I am not as smart as I thought I was…”

Epilogue: The Future of Print, a beautiful video

 
4 Lessons in Creativity from John Cleese! Brilliant, truly brilliant.  It is similar to what he says in the speech below in 1991…

Knowledge Nibbles

  As you all know, the Internet is full of amazing things… here are some interesting titbits to keep your minds sharp!

 

Ramadaan is here…So Ramadaan Kareem!

Everyone will see it and appreciate it in their own ways. I love how being part of the Muslim Ummah means we participate in the same events, enriched with different traditions and cultural teachings.  What are your traditions during Ramadaan??

  • Football is the Best Sport: I definitely, whole heartedly agree! Here, the argument is made for why it is the most “morally interesting” sport…

Being the fairest and unfairest of all games helps to make football the most morally interesting…

Rapunzel. Like a Boss.

 

  • MotoGP news: Honda delivers two different bikes in order to try solve this intriguing tire chatter issue. I love a meaty engineering design problem. Check out the GP mag in general for recent motorsport news…

British GP...

  • This is definitely something I want to write about or mull on more – a study shows that over the past decade or so, womens’ expectations have risen in terms of career and family… They increasingly value both.
  • An interesting piece on the limitations of dichotomies.  I feel as I am getting older and experiencing more, I am less and less sure that people can be black and white on issues, or that people can have a stance without even deigning to take into account the various other aspects.  There aren’t two sides to every story… there are five, or ten, or hundreds…

If bullies aren’t “born” but are created through perverse motivation and circumstances, why continue to give the dichotomy credibility? Why are we willing, in the face of empirical evidence that the dichotomy is impoverished and wrong, to go about using it when setting anti-bullying policy?

My word of the week:

Quixotism (/kwɪkˈsɒtɪzəm/ or /kiːˈhoʊtɪzəm/) is impracticality in pursuit of ideals, especially those ideals manifested by rash, lofty and romantic ideas or extravagantly chivalrous action.[1] It also serves to describe an idealism without regard to practicality. An impulsive person or act might be regarded as quixotic.

Quixotism is usually related to "over-idealism", meaning an idealism that doesn't take consequence or absurdity into account. It is also related to naïve romanticism and toutopianism.

Interesting…

Luscious Links

  So this has been a little while coming... here are some interesting reads for your consumption! Lots of food for thought...and some music to soothe the soul.

The future is better than you think:

Perhaps the most significant change of the next decade will be the dramatic increase in worldwide connectivity via the Internet. The online community is projected to grow from 2 billion people in 2010 to 5 billion by 2020. Three billion new minds are about to join the global brain trust. What will they dream? What will they discover? What will they invent? These are minds that the rest of society has never had access to before, and their collective economic and creative boost becomes our final force: the power of “the rising billion.” We are living in a time of unprecedented opportunity.

The Battleground that is Saudi Women in Sport: Don't forget that most Saudi women are banned from sport

Physical education for girls is banned in the public school system and while there are more than 150 official sports clubs regulated by the sports ministry, general presidency of youth welfare, none of them even allow women on the grounds, never mind to actually play. Saudi women are not only not allowed to participate, they are barred as spectators in all major stadiums.

Great Essay: Egyptian women and Mohammed Morsi

Morsi won the election by a slim margin, and is now President of Egypt. His first few days in office have already been eventful. He banned portraits of himself in public spaces, asked for minimum security when moving around Egypt, met the families of the martyrs and guaranteed them access to him directly, and has announced that his two vice-presidents will be a woman and a Coptic Christian**. These moves have already impressed many both inside and outside Egypt, and are a welcome change from Mubarak’s reign. An important point is that Morsi won the election because he was supported by a variety of social actors, including activists, revolutionaries, youth groups, and Egyptians who did not want a member of the old regime to win. This means that Morsi has a lot to prove. He knows that he would not be President without the support of Egyptians who do not necessarily identify with or support the Muslim Brotherhood or their ideals. The pressure on Morsi is immense, and the expectations endless.

**CNN reports on Morsi appointing a woman and a Coptic Christian as his VP’s, a smart move indeed…

The revolution must be peaceful: A really interesting look on whether revolts must be peaceful, or if that can actually succeed? A question I have been asking of myself lately…

While there is no doubt that a peaceful revolution is a good thing to aspire to, I wonder if it can simultaneously be effective? Can brute power be removed peacefully? Can an entrenched regime that doesn’t have second thoughts about using violence be brought down through peaceful demonstrations and organizing? On the other hand, could it be the case that we are taught that peaceful people power is pointless and ineffective? Are we somehow bringing ourselves down to their level of inhumanness by engaging in violence?

The Little Syrian Town That Could: Photos from Foreign Policy

Posters for the international community. Witty!

Criticism of the UN Envoy to Syria

Some amazing tunes from around Africa…

(Start the above at about 2:50 for the music)

That is all for today, stay tuned for more though! The Interweb is full of such interesting information…I shall never sleep at this rate! =o

Blogroll: #SudanRevolts 27-28th June 2012

Hello all. In the essence of laying low...here is some information other people wrote =) Also posted on the SudanRevolts blog, of which I am current Media Monitor. For any suggestions for articles etc, please let me know.

Now that the international media is picking the story up a little more, there is plenty of analysis to get your teeth into.

Here is a tip: If you are on twitter and want to follow people clued into the movement, check out this list.   

June 27th, 2012

A great collection of photos from Foreign Policy

The United States condemns the crackdown on protesters 

Christian Caryl asks the media to cover the story of #SudanRevolts in the piece: The Sudanese Stand up

Jadaliyya provides a great analysis on understanding the prospects and challenges for another popular intifada in Sudan.

Sandstorm Friday on Foreign Policy

Economic hardship is joining corruption, war and crackdowns among the grievances of Sudan's citizens against the ruling regime as political forces unite for change, writes Asmaa El-Husseini in this peace in Al Ahram

Armin rosen from World Affairs asks the question, is this a Khartoum Spring?

Of all the Arab Spring processes, the violent and nonviolent opposition to the NCP could turn out to be the least predictable—and the most destabilizing—in the region. But it could also offer Sudan something it hasn’t had since the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement in 2005, the treaty with the Sudanese People’s Liberation Movement that ended decades of civil war, and a pact that Khartoum has been sabotaging and violating in various ways for the past seven years. It could offer a chance for the egalitarian and democratic future that Bashir and the NCP have so violently denied their country.

***

So on the eve of the Lick Your Elbows Friday...what can we offer in terms of reading fodder?

June 28th, 2012

Round up of great links by Foreign Policy for some background information.

Darfur SLM offers its support for peaceful protests

Change is in the air in Sudan says the Guardian

Elbows and Sandstorms in Khartoum

Egyptians in Solidarity:

We Egyptians have learned over the past year and a half that people all over the world can make a difference, and so solidarity and support are essential for the success of any legitimate call for justice and human rights. When the international media was reluctant to upset our dictator, the words of the people all over the world on social media and their protests in front of Egyptian embassies made a difference. We are all in the same trench, so regardless of nationality, we must seek freedom for others, just as we do for ourselves.

The Independent reports on the importance of the Lick Your Elbow demonstrations:

Khartoum is braced for a "make or break" day of demonstrations tomorrow, as anger at the rising cost of living spills over into Arab Spring-style protests on the streets of Sudan's capital.

The guardian highlights the elbow licking jibe

Reuters analysis on the movement so far

Blog Roll - 25th June - #SudanRevolts

Doing a little Media Monitoring gig so will be collecting articles and analysis that comes out on the current #SudanRevolts.  Please let me know if you would like to be featured or if I have missed anything significant.  This can also be found on the #SudanRevolts blog.

Highlights from 25th of June 2012
Women set the spark (as we so awesome!)
Honourable mention from the 22nd

Riveting Reads: 10 June 2012

Coming to you every Sunday: a roundup of a few interesting reads from the week... I am a little bit of a Google Reader Freak and often come across interesting reads that I want to respond to or at least discuss.  Here are a few of the articles I have read this week that might be of interest...and might spawn a blog post or two in the near future:

What Happens When You Live Abroad

When you live abroad, you realize that, no matter where you are, you will always be an ex-pat. There will always be a part of you that is far away from its home and is lying dormant until it can breathe and live in full color back in the country where it belongs. To live in a new place is a beautiful, thrilling thing, and it can show you that you can be whoever you want — on your own terms. It can give you the gift of freedom, of new beginnings, of curiosity and excitement. But to start over, to get on that plane, doesn’t come without a price. You cannot be in two places at once, and from now on, you will always lay awake on certain nights and think of all the things you’re missing out on back home.

Straight White Male: The Lowest Difficulty Setting There Is

This article spawned insane reactions throughout the "blogosphere" (always wanted to use that word...). An interesting "computer game" analogy that essentially describes the concept of "privilege" in today's world.

So that’s “Straight White Male” for you in The Real World (and also, in the real world): The lowest difficulty setting there is. All things being equal, and even when they are not, if the computer — or life — assigns you the “Straight White Male” difficulty setting, then brother, you’ve caught a break.

Here is an interesting response on what you can do with that privilege.

On the same note, an interesting article (pdf) on three different levels of racism...

A reminder to always be kinder than necessary, a lovely story...

"We’re conditioned to think that our lives revolve around great moments, but great moments often catch us unaware - beautifully wrapped in what others may consider a small one."

Something a little more technical: A great documentary about how Turbo F1 engines started...

Even with the steps taken forward in Myanmar, there are still concerning religious clashes

Lastly, I am fascinated by the concept of the Prisoner's Dilemma: do you understand the psychology behind it?

***

Some of my recent doings

The Friday Five: Some design thoughts with the Queensland Design Council... 

Brought to you by the Queensland Design Council, the Friday Five Q&A project invites design and industry leaders to give insight into what inspires them, and to hear their ideas and goals for good design in Queensland and around the world.

A media release about the luncheon with the Australian High Commission in Malaysia

 

On Choking

Why do some athletes, performers and people under pressure succumb to odd or amorphous failures, also known as choking? An article in the New Yorker offers new insight...

There is something poignant about this deconstruction of choking. It suggests that the reason some performers fall apart on the back nine or at the free-throw line is because they care too much. They really want to win, and so they get unravelled by the pressure of the moment. The simple pleasures of the game have vanished; the fear of losing is what remains.

An interesting read on the neuroscience of choking, via an interesting tumblr: YMFY

More reading:

The Art of Failure -- an article on the psychology of choking

Choking is about thinking too much. Panic is about thinking too little. Choking is about loss of instinct. Panic is reversion to instinct. They may look the same, but they are worlds apart...

 

Response: To Girls About Religious Men Who Fear You

I came across this interesting article the other day by a lady named Soraya Chemaly...

A Message to Girls About Religious Men Who Fear You

I think I can understand what she was trying to say.  She was trying to encourage girls to not be limited by what she terms as "men with power who fear you and want to control you".  She continues in this vein:

I know that I have equated relatively benign baseball games with deadly, honor killings but, whereas one is a type of daily, seemingly harmless micro-aggression and the other is a lethal macro-aggression they share the same roots. The basis of both, and escalating actions in between, is the sameTo teach you, and all girls subject to these men and their authority, a lesson: "Know your place." I also know that there are places where girls are marginalized and hurt that are not religious. But all over the world these hypocritical, pious men, in their shamefully obvious wrongness, represent the sharp-edged tip of an iceberg, the visible surface of a deep and vast harm. They employ the full range of their earthly and divine influence to make sure, as early as possible, that you and the boys around you understand what they want your relative roles to be. Where there are patriarchal religions girls, in dramatically varying and extreme degrees, disproportionately suffer.

She continues to advise girls to reject the ideas of these men:

You, and the boys you know, understand that your bodies are different, but that you are far more alike than dissimilar. Threatened, insecure, adult men say otherwise. Don't give in. Even if you're quiet. The differences these religious authorities exaggerate are simply pillars of oppression used to teach boys and girls that women's subjugation is "natural" and "divine." Reject them and their ideas.

She them implicates the women that are often, she says, "enable" these men:

First, and perhaps the most difficult to understand as a girl, is that women who love you and care for you often enable these men. This is what people say, "It's not JUST men!" And they are right, women support them, individually and in groups, in ways that have private, public, political and societal consequences. But, make no mistake -- although women are the enforcers of rules, they have no real, systemic authority in conservative religious hierarchies, and they know this. Yes, without their support these men could not continue, but until these women are truly free -- bodily, economically, physically, politically -- and their practical and spiritual salvation is no longer mediated by these very men, they will continue to support them. Enforcing the rules is a rational choice that enables them to survive, the world over, in unjust environments. You scare them too, because you call in to question their own complicity and cause conflict within.

So... head on over to the whole article to see the rest of her points.

As I said, I can understand the sentiment. However something about the article makes me uneasy.

I think the reason for my discomfort may lie in the article's conflation of "religious men" with their "ideas", subtly suggesting to me that is it these religious ideas that are at fault.

Perhaps I am reading too much into it, perhaps my high school critical literacy classes are still affecting the way I see things.  However when I read phrases such as Reject them and their ideas... 

I don't disagree completely with Soraya.  There are men in the world, quite often men who see themselves as religious, even pious men, who hold extremely misogynistic, sexist and patriarchal views.  However, that does not mean that we should go out into the world with a "Reject them all" attitude.  For how can you hope to change minds or gain respect from anyone if you approach the world with such an aggressive approach?  Furthermore, it is unfair to conflate the actions of men with the religions or religious ideas they claim to represent.  

I grow weary of people -- both men and women -- trying to "fight the fight" on behalf of Muslim women who are "being oppressed by their religion".

Ladies and gentlemen, Islam does not oppress women.

If anyone oppresses women, it is oppressive and patriarchal cultures that exist around the world.  Unfortunately, many of these nations are largely Muslim, so people assume that the religiosity of these men makes them misogynists.  No.

In fact, Islam came and liberated women, it gave them rights that they never previously had! Check out this blog for a variety of examples -- Islam gave women the right to own land and forbid forced marriages for example, in a time when that was unimaginable.

I agree with Soraya on the gist of her argument however.  We, as women, should not allow ourselves to limited by the attitudes of the men around us.  As long as we know what we are doing is right by the value system and principles that we live by, then we should not limit ourselves based on the opinions of others.

Instead, when challenging the issues that are ever present in our society, we do so by changing our narrative.  Taking control of our own discourse.  Doing what we want to do, what we believe is right and what we can do, without "rejecting" opposing arguments, but with minimal engagement at all. 

Doing things that aren't expected, like being an engineer.

Doing things that we enjoy doing even if they are expected, like shopping.

Simply doing.

We write articles like this one, "The Women's Crusade", which highlights the fabulous work that women are doing in the face of hardship.  Articles like this highlight the difficulties women face, but goes further and shows what women are doing to change that.  (Granted it is a very US centric article, but it does the job!)

That makes me proud.

So I invite all who are frustrated by attitudes they see and experience to perhaps just do.  Trust me, living in Sudan I have experienced my fair share of such attitudes...including from those who are close to me, and I definitely can relate to the idea of "enablers".  However you know what has been most instrumental in changing their minds, "subtly rejecting their misogynistic ideas" and challenging the norms?

Just doing what I wanted to, regardless of whether it's "what women do".

Sure, I get mocked.

But then people start to wonder... perhaps it's not such a strange thing for girls to do after all.

***

I did learn how to cook though. Because of course... I want to at least be able to cook for my husband...right? Haha.

***

 

 

Riveting Reads: Quran and Women

Many a time I have been asked about the the harsh punishment for adultery in Islam and how it is justified etc... This article talks about the Quran and the women's perspective...but an excerpt I thought was particularly poignant:

...verses were revealed to prevent men from slandering innocent women, which we can infer was (and still is) a regular occurrence. ...With the objective of making this as difficult as possible, the Qur’an demands a man produce four witnesses to accuse his wife of adultery; or, in the absence of four witnesses, he may swear to God she is an adulteress four times. And then, to seal the testimony, one more time. But the woman is excused if she then swears four times, and then finally once more, that he is a liar. If she did indeed commit adultery, the wrath of God is upon her, but she is discharged of any worldly chastisement, and the court is dismissed.

Not only this, but as the preceding verse states, the testimony of a man who gives it falselyis to never be accepted again.

Isn't that interesting, and unprecedentedly pro women?

Nahida, the author, sums it up perfectly when she states:

Most of the Quran’s provisions (from inheritance, to divorce [in which men are obligated to provide for their wives for three months afterward in case they are pregnant], to female infanticide, to testimony) are absorbed in preserving women’s interests, so that when the Qur’an notes male privilege it is only recognizing that men have power unjustly, not condoning patriarchy or authorizing this power. 

Read More